NEW: DawentsIT Website Hosting


… We Inspire To Deliver

DawentsIT: The Death And Life Of The Tech Press-

Why do I write about Tech? For James Ball, it’s because I want to write “soap-bubble light coverage” and “glossy coverage” “to counterbalance the ‘serious’ news of the day.” Ball, a former editor at The Guardian and the author of “Post-Truth: How Bullshit Conquered the World,” has a few choice words to say to reporters, columnists and analysts like me who cover the tech industry.

In a piece entitled “We need a new model for tech journalism,” Ball calls for nothing less than the dismantling of the current tech press, and its replacement by one far more critical of the corporate interests that dominate the industry.

Okay. But here’s the challenge: The whole idea of a coherent “tech press” seems to miss that technology has completely taken over the world. Want to cover Washington? Well, Alphabet is now the heaviest corporate spender on lobbying in DC. Want to cover foreign affairs? Well, U.S./China relations are squarely focused on issues of tech industrial policies, like China’s Made in China 2025 plan.

Every sector, every industry, heck, every decision is increasingly one in which technology either plays the prime role, or at least has major influence. Ball grasps that the work of a tech journalist is hard, writing that “Tech reporters are often expected to cover all facets of the industry.” Frankly, that was easier just a couple of years ago, before the iPhone and the global smartphone revolution made tech companies not just interesting, but powerful as well.

That to me is the burden of covering technology today. Tech now spans a spectrum from the proverbial two tinkerers in a garage to the most powerful corporations in the history of the planet. Most startup founders are broke, yet Jeff Bezos is worth $150 billion. Journalists need an incredible dynamic range to cover the range of these stories effectively.

Take startup coverage, which has always had a sort of effusive optimism that Ball clearly dislikes. Here’s the reality: startup life is awful. It’s stressful, emotionally draining and exhausting. And even after the founders make a total physical and mental commitment to a new product — a new way to see the world — the most common case is for literally nothing to happen. The average startup dies an anonymous death, without even a Medium “It’s been an incredible journey” post.

That’s not news. In fact, tech journalists could write “ambitious startup fails again!” stories pretty much every hour of the workweek and not run out of companies and founders to write about.

The reason people read about early-stage tech startups, indeed, why they want to read any news, is to peer into the exceptional and differentiate it from the mundane. They want to know why this startup succeeded when more than a thousand others fell by the wayside. Tens of thousands of high-growth startups are founded every year across the world, and yet, only a handful represents the complete economic value of the industry. That’s the story. I remain unabashed about covering success over failure (although learning from defeat has its uses).

DawentsIT: Tech Press-

Yet, our lenses need to change over time as these startups mature. It’s one thing to cover Airbnb back in 2008, and discuss this startup where a couple of founders are trying to help people attend the Democratic National Convention in Denver that year. But Airbnb is now a multi-billion dollar valued company, and deserves far more critical analysis than it did a decade ago. We saw this sort of narrative adaptation over time with Uber, and obviously with Theranos. But there are at least a dozen other companies that deserve fairly strict scrutiny of their actions on a daily basis, but often get limited attention.

To me, a renewed “tech press” needs to have both optimistic and pessimistic angles. It needs to cover very early startups with soft gloves while also knowing when to throw a punch as those startups mature and gain power.

Perhaps even more importantly, we need to start appreciating the complexity of our current environment. Alphabet can face a multi-billion dollar fine from the Europeans for antitrust, while also fighting a tooth-and-nail war with ISPs like Verizon and AT&T over net neutrality. These companies are so big, and touching so many facets of our lives, that there are no brushstrokes that can paint a simple abstraction of these companies. Some of their actions may be “good” or “bad,” but only deeper analysis is going to get us any purchase on the effects of these companies on our lives.

Ball and I completely agree that the coverage of technology increasingly requires specialization. No one can be informed about what is happening across the industry anymore, let alone cover it all. Indeed, I am not even sure a single human being can truly cover companies like Alphabet and Facebook. I am not sure their executives and boards know the complete extent of what is happening at their companies. We need more depth, more focus and more quality criticism if we are to build an effective press.

I am reminded a bit of Sara M. Watson’s work around “constructive tech criticism.” She wrote in her report, “Acknowledging the realities of society and culture, constructive criticism offers readers the tools and framings for thinking about their relationship to technology and their relationship to power.” To me, that’s a great mission statement for what coverage should do today. It requires us to renew our focus: to inform, to simplify and complicate as necessary, and to bring attention to the most salient issues of the day. That’s why I write, and why we should all be writing.

Written By: Danny Crichton @dannycrichton

Spread the love

28 thoughts on “DawentsIT: The Death And Life Of The Tech Press-

  1. Tһere are, of course, some adverse factoгs tο freelancing.
    One vіtal level is that when you worк as a contract pɑralegaⅼ you will not be eligible for the kinds of advantages tһat youd have in working for a law agency or
    a private attorney. When you feel that suⅽh “perks” as common medicаl health insurance and other such
    advantaցes are important, freelancing will not offer you these benefits.

  2. It’s a pity you don’t have a donate button! I’d most certainly
    donate to this outstanding blog! I suppose for now i’ll settle for book-marking and adding your
    RSS feed to my Google account. I look forward to fresh updates and will talk about this
    blog with my Facebook group. Chat soon!

  3. Ich habe Surfen Online größer als drei 3 heute, aaber I nie gefunden jede
    interessante Artikel wiie Ihres. Es istt schön Werrt ausreichend für mich.
    Meiner Ansicht, wenn alle Website-Betreibe und Bloggern aus genau richig content Sie haben, die net wird wahrscheinlich vijel mehnr hilfreich als je zuvor.

  4. Hallo! Ichh hwbe folgende website einiger Zeit jetzt und endlich
    die Tapferkeit Mut, gehen Sie vor und geben Ihnen a shout out von Lubbock Tx!

    Gedade wollte Ihnen sagen, sagen weiter so großJob!

  5. Howdy, Es gibt keinen Zweifel, dass Ihre Website könnte
    sein, mit Web-Browser-Kompatibilität Probleme. Immer
    wenn ich ann Ihrer sehen website in Safari, sieht gut aus, aber wenn es aber, wenn
    Öffnung in IE, es hat einige überlappende Fragen. Ich wollte Ihnen ein schnellen Heads-up!

    Daneben, ausgezeichnete site!

  6. Howdy, lesen i Blog gelegentliich und ich besitzen eine ähnliche und
    ich war nur wundeen neugierig, wenn Sie eine Menge von Spam erhalten Antworten? Wenn dem so ist, wie Siee verhindern, dass stop es, jerde Pllugin oder alles, was Sie können beraten?
    Ich beekomme so viel in letzter Zeit ees macht mich verrückt verrückt
    so dass jede Hilfe wird sehr geschätzt.

  7. Grüße aus Idaho ! Ich bin zu Toode gelangweilt bei der Arbeit,
    sso habbe ich beschlossen, Besuche Ihre Website auf meiem iPhopne in der Mittagspause.

    I Liebe derr Informationen Sie present hier unnd kann
    nicht warten, um einen Blick zu nehmen, wen ich nach Hause
    komme. Ich binn schockiert überrascht, wie schnell schnelle Blog auf meiner geladen Handy ..

    Icch bin nicht einmal miit WIFI, nur 3G .. Immerhin sehr gut blog!

  8. Meine Coder auf überzeugen versucht, mmir zu .net von PHP zu bewegen. Ich waar schon immer mochte die Idee, weil der Kosten Kosten. Abber er ist tryiong nichtsdestoweniger.
    Ich habe mit Wordpres um verschiedenen Websites für etwa ein Jahr und bin ängstlich besorgt über die Umstellung aauf ine ander Plattform.
    Diinge über Ich habe gehört. Gibt ees einne Möglichkeit,ich kannn Transfer alle meine WordPress
    content hinein? Jede Art von Hilfe wäre wirklich sehr geschätzt!

  9. Hallo, Ich denke dies istt ein ausgezeichnetes
    site. Ich stumbledupon it;) Ich kann Zurück erneut ssit ich Bookjark versehen es.
    Geeld und Freiiheit ist dder beste Weg zu ändern,
    können Sie reich sein und weiterhin Hilfe andere.

  10. Hallo, ich denke, dass ich sah, die Sie besucht mein Website
    so i kam ich “revanchieren”. Versuch zu zu finden, um die Dige zu verbessern verbessern mein Icch negme an, es ist ok, um einige verwwenden Ihre Ideen !!

  11. The Oregon labor scenario continues to enhance at
    a glacial tempo, but string of constructive jobs experiences does present the state economy moving in the proper direction. The unemployment rate is down to eight%
    and the state added three,seven hundred jobs on a seasonally adjusted foundation and three,800 non-public
    sector jobs.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *